Rajasthan
Bomb Blast: 2008 Serial Blasts: Hc Grants Bail In Defused Bomb Case | Jaipur News
Jaipur: A single bench of Rajasthan High Court on Monday granted bail to Mohammed Sarwar Azmi in the 2008 Jaipur bomb blast case related to a bomb that was defused outside Chandpole Hanumangarh temple. Azmi is lodged in jail since January 19, 2009.
Syed Saadat Ali, counsel for Azmi, said that after the accused’s acquittal in Jaipur bomb blast case, theAnti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) rearrested Azmi on December 25, 2019, and despite his acquittal by the high court, he remained in jail.
On March 29 this year, the high court acquitted four accused—Mohammad Saif (32), Mohammad Sarwar Azmi (36), Saif-Ur-Rahman (36) and Salman (34)—who were given capital punishment by the trial court in Jaipur in December 2019.
“We pleaded in the court that in the eight bomb blasts, the HC acquitted the accused on March 29 this year. In the investigation of the defused bomb case, all the evidence and circumstances were the same. Also, Azmi has been in jail since 2009 but no investigation was carried out for the defused bomb,” Ali said.
He added that in the eight serial blasts case the HC had acquitted all the accused. However, the ATS re-arrested Azmi after his acquittal.
Earlier, the trial court had rejected Azmi’s bail.
“We also pleaded that the charge-sheet, witnesses and facts are identical in the case as in the serial blasts case. Thus, he should be given bail,” Ali told TOI.
The high court’s single bench comprising Justice Birendra Kumar granted bail after hearing the arguments by the petitioner’s counsel and by the state government’s advocate.
We also published the following articles recently
Syed Saadat Ali, counsel for Azmi, said that after the accused’s acquittal in Jaipur bomb blast case, theAnti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) rearrested Azmi on December 25, 2019, and despite his acquittal by the high court, he remained in jail.
On March 29 this year, the high court acquitted four accused—Mohammad Saif (32), Mohammad Sarwar Azmi (36), Saif-Ur-Rahman (36) and Salman (34)—who were given capital punishment by the trial court in Jaipur in December 2019.
“We pleaded in the court that in the eight bomb blasts, the HC acquitted the accused on March 29 this year. In the investigation of the defused bomb case, all the evidence and circumstances were the same. Also, Azmi has been in jail since 2009 but no investigation was carried out for the defused bomb,” Ali said.
He added that in the eight serial blasts case the HC had acquitted all the accused. However, the ATS re-arrested Azmi after his acquittal.
Earlier, the trial court had rejected Azmi’s bail.
“We also pleaded that the charge-sheet, witnesses and facts are identical in the case as in the serial blasts case. Thus, he should be given bail,” Ali told TOI.
The high court’s single bench comprising Justice Birendra Kumar granted bail after hearing the arguments by the petitioner’s counsel and by the state government’s advocate.
We also published the following articles recently
In jail since 2019, plead Wadhawans; court refuses to grant bail
A special court in Mumbai has refused to grant bail to HDIL promoters Rakesh and Sarang Wadhawan, stating that their deep-rooted involvement in money laundering is evident from the rejection of their previous bail pleas. The court emphasized the large amount of public money involved in the case, with the total proceeds of crime being Rs 6,117.9 crore. The court also noted that the Wadhawans had filed multiple bail pleas and challenged subsequent orders, which caused delays in the proceedings. The judge stated that both the severity of the crime and the time spent in jail should be considered when granting bail.
A special court in Mumbai has refused to grant bail to HDIL promoters Rakesh and Sarang Wadhawan, stating that their deep-rooted involvement in money laundering is evident from the rejection of their previous bail pleas. The court emphasized the large amount of public money involved in the case, with the total proceeds of crime being Rs 6,117.9 crore. The court also noted that the Wadhawans had filed multiple bail pleas and challenged subsequent orders, which caused delays in the proceedings. The judge stated that both the severity of the crime and the time spent in jail should be considered when granting bail.
CBI court grants bail to 2 middlemen in graft case
Two middlemen, Anil Kumar and Munish Dubey, have been granted bail by a special CBI court in a graft case involving Rs 7 lakh. They were arrested while accepting a bribe of Rs 3 lakh on behalf of constable Pawan and inspector Harinder Singh Sekhon. The third accused, constable Pawan Kumar, managed to escape. The complainant, Deepak, alleged that he was summoned to the operation cell office and was detained for two days. He lodged a complaint with the CBI after being released.
Two middlemen, Anil Kumar and Munish Dubey, have been granted bail by a special CBI court in a graft case involving Rs 7 lakh. They were arrested while accepting a bribe of Rs 3 lakh on behalf of constable Pawan and inspector Harinder Singh Sekhon. The third accused, constable Pawan Kumar, managed to escape. The complainant, Deepak, alleged that he was summoned to the operation cell office and was detained for two days. He lodged a complaint with the CBI after being released.
Tis Hazari court firing: 9 accused granted bail
Nine accused in the Tis Hazari court firing case in Delhi have been granted bail by a local court. The court considered the fact that the charge sheet had been filed and some accused had already been in custody for around 90 days. The accused were granted bail on the condition of furnishing a bail bond of Rs 50,000 and one surety bond in the same amount. Various other conditions were also imposed, including restrictions on fleeing from justice and tampering with evidence. One bail application was kept pending for October 7.
Nine accused in the Tis Hazari court firing case in Delhi have been granted bail by a local court. The court considered the fact that the charge sheet had been filed and some accused had already been in custody for around 90 days. The accused were granted bail on the condition of furnishing a bail bond of Rs 50,000 and one surety bond in the same amount. Various other conditions were also imposed, including restrictions on fleeing from justice and tampering with evidence. One bail application was kept pending for October 7.
