Jaipur: A single bench of Rajasthan High Court on Saturday stayed the arrest of suspended additional SP, Ajmer Divya Mittaland Sanjay Nandwani. The bench gave this order on the petitions filed by Mittal and Sanjay. The court has issued a notice to the state government in the matter and sought reply. In the petition seeking quashing of FIR against Mittal , advocate Mohit Khandelwal told the court that on the basis of this statement and mobile recording, police registered FIRs against petitioners, arrested her and presented a chargesheet.tnn
We also published the following articles recently
We also published the following articles recently
AAP’s Sanjay Singh moves Supreme Court challenging order of Delhi high court
Aam Aadmi Party leader Sanjay Singh has filed a petition in the Supreme Court after the Delhi High Court dismissed his plea challenging his arrest in the Delhi Liquor Scam case. Singh has termed his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate as illegal. The Rouse Avenue Court has extended his judicial custody until November 10. Singh has also been granted permission to seek private medical treatment and to handle family expenses. The Delhi liquor scam case involves allegations of cartelization and bribery in the Arvind Kejriwal-led Delhi government’s excise policy.
Aam Aadmi Party leader Sanjay Singh has filed a petition in the Supreme Court after the Delhi High Court dismissed his plea challenging his arrest in the Delhi Liquor Scam case. Singh has termed his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate as illegal. The Rouse Avenue Court has extended his judicial custody until November 10. Singh has also been granted permission to seek private medical treatment and to handle family expenses. The Delhi liquor scam case involves allegations of cartelization and bribery in the Arvind Kejriwal-led Delhi government’s excise policy.
Petition in Supreme Court seeks review of same-sex judgment
Four members of the LGBTQIA+ community have filed a petition seeking a review of a recent Supreme Court judgment that denied legal recognition to same-sex marriages under the Special Marriage Act. The petitioners argue that the judgment denies them the right to marry, choose a partner, and form a family, which are privileges granted to heterosexual couples. They believe that the court recognized the discrimination faced by the LGBTQIA+ community but failed to provide appropriate relief.
Four members of the LGBTQIA+ community have filed a petition seeking a review of a recent Supreme Court judgment that denied legal recognition to same-sex marriages under the Special Marriage Act. The petitioners argue that the judgment denies them the right to marry, choose a partner, and form a family, which are privileges granted to heterosexual couples. They believe that the court recognized the discrimination faced by the LGBTQIA+ community but failed to provide appropriate relief.
Coordinate bench observations no ground for review, says Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that a review of a judgment cannot be allowed based solely on a passing reference made by another bench of equal strength. The court rejected a review petition seeking re-examination of a previous verdict on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The bench stated that if a bench does not agree with a decision made by another bench of equal strength, the proper course of action would be to refer the matter to a larger bench for a definitive decision. The ruling is significant as it sets a precedent for similar cases in the future.
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that a review of a judgment cannot be allowed based solely on a passing reference made by another bench of equal strength. The court rejected a review petition seeking re-examination of a previous verdict on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The bench stated that if a bench does not agree with a decision made by another bench of equal strength, the proper course of action would be to refer the matter to a larger bench for a definitive decision. The ruling is significant as it sets a precedent for similar cases in the future.
