Rajasthan

RTI Pending: All Cases Of Rti Pending Up To 2022 Cleared, Says Outgoing Cic | Jaipur News

Jaipur: D B Gupta, who completed three-year term as chief information commissioner (CIC) on Thursday, said there was huge pendency of cases which has been cleared during his tenure. The cases have been pending since 2007 under Right to Information (RTI).
The cases reach Rajasthan State Information Commission when the applicant do not get the satisfactory reply on the information he or she seeks from the department concerned.
It was the last day of Gupta as CIC. He said that in the past, 56,484 cases were pending since 2007, which the commission has taken on priority and in the last three years, 48,749 cases have been disposed of and at present no case is pending till 2022.
“Now, all the cases up to 2022 have been cleared except for the cases filed in 2023 which are about 7,000 in numbers,” said, Gupta.
While addressing newspersons, Gupta said, “We organised special courts to clear the pendency. Separate special courts were organised for cases related to Jaipur Development Authority, municipal bodies and Shiksha Sankul. Besides, separate special courts were organised for hearing the cases division wise.”
In the past three years, innovations have been made for quick disposal of pending cases and ease in filing RTI. Out of which, special courts, speed post, online application, online hearing and in view of the shortage of courts, two court rooms have also been constructed.
An innovation has been made to send notices, documents and decisions of hearing of appeals through speed post from February 2022. The step has resolved the complaint of not getting the notice on time. Gupta said that earlier the appellants who live in remote areas had to face difficulty in coming to the office, but from April 2022, the system of filing the second appeal has been made online, due to which their registration, notice of hearing date and all the proceedings till the final decision are being done online.
The facility of online hearing has been started as a pilot project in three courts under which complainants can choose either hybrid mode which allows in-person hearing or online hearing for the hearing.
We also published the following articles recently

Pendency of cybercrime cases high at 97% in courts
Cybercrime cases in Mumbai increased by 64% in 2022, with a pendency of 97% in courts. Experts demand special cyber courts with trained lawyers and judges, as well as a central Cyber police force under the Ministry of Home Affairs. The National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) report shows a surge in cases from 2883 in 2021 to 4724 in 2022. Top motives for cybercrimes in Mumbai were fraud and sexual exploitation. Cyber lawyer Prashant Mali emphasizes the need for time-bound prosecutions and amendments to the Information Technology Act. A central cyber police force would address jurisdiction issues and facilitate coordination in cases. Specialized cyber courts are crucial to handle the increasing number of cases and hold intermediaries accountable.
Chhattisgarh HC witnesses historic decrease in pending cases due to speedy disposal
Chhattisgarh High Court sees a decrease in pending cases due to swift case resolution efforts by Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha. Data shows a 6.38% increase in pending cases from March 29, 2022, to December 1, 2022. However, there is a reduction of 1.47% in pending cases from March 29, 2023, to December 1, 2023. Chief Justice Sinha has disposed of 22% of the total cases, with a significant increase in the disposal percentage of the High Court.
Gyanvapi case: Court to hear plea against Akhilesh Yadav, Asaduddin Owaisi’s remarks on Dec 7
The Varanasi court has fixed December 7 as the next hearing date in the case related to a petition seeking an FIR against Akhilesh Yadav and Asaduddin Owaisi for their alleged remarks on claims of a shivling found in Gyanvapi mosque complex. The hearing was deferred as lawyers abstained from judicial work. Senior advocate Harishankar Pandey had filed the petition in May 2022, demanding a case against Yadav, Owaisi, and the Gyanvapi mosque management committee. The ACJM-V court had declared the petition maintainable but rejected it in February. Pandey then filed a revision petition transferred to the court of additional district judge.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Uh oh. Looks like you're using an ad blocker.

We charge advertisers instead of our audience. Please whitelist our site to show your support for Nirala Samaj