Rajasthan
Extinction Event: Hc Imposes 50k Fine On State Govt In Contempt Petition | Jaipur News
Jaipur: A single bench of Rajasthan High Court while hearing a contempt petition on Monday imposed Rs 50,000 as fine on the state government and asked the additional chief secretary, Panchayati Raj to appear before the court on October 19. The case is about providing salary to Bansur gram panchayat employee by considering him as a regular worker 1983 onwards. Justice Mahendra Goyal gave the orders while hearing a petition filed by the family of one Lalaram Saini who died on September 3, 2021.
“Lalaram worked as class IV employee of gram panchayat, Bansur from 1983 on contract. When he retired on July 31, 2020, the government stated that he was not entitled to a pension as he was on contract,” Hanuman Chaudhary, the petitioner’s counsel said.
The family approached the HC in 2021 and filed a petition to treat him as a regular employee. “A single bench on January 21, 2021 ordered that Lalaram be treated as regular and given all the benefits as a regular employee from 1983 till 2020. The state approached double bench of HC against the order, which dismissed the appeal on May 6, 2022,” Chaudhary added.
A contempt petition was filed on September 17, 2021, in which initially notices were issued. “Meanwhile, the state began family pension, but withheld other benefits. Two months ago, the HC told the state to comply with its orders. On Monday, the government sought more time,” the counsel added. tnn
We also published the following articles recently
“Lalaram worked as class IV employee of gram panchayat, Bansur from 1983 on contract. When he retired on July 31, 2020, the government stated that he was not entitled to a pension as he was on contract,” Hanuman Chaudhary, the petitioner’s counsel said.
The family approached the HC in 2021 and filed a petition to treat him as a regular employee. “A single bench on January 21, 2021 ordered that Lalaram be treated as regular and given all the benefits as a regular employee from 1983 till 2020. The state approached double bench of HC against the order, which dismissed the appeal on May 6, 2022,” Chaudhary added.
A contempt petition was filed on September 17, 2021, in which initially notices were issued. “Meanwhile, the state began family pension, but withheld other benefits. Two months ago, the HC told the state to comply with its orders. On Monday, the government sought more time,” the counsel added. tnn
We also published the following articles recently
Cong planning to file contempt petition against Tawadkar
The Congress party is planning to file a contempt petition against speaker Ramesh Tawadkar for not deciding on the defection of eight Congress MLAs to the BJP. The party’s legal team is working on the petition, which could be filed soon. The Supreme Court has already issued notices to Tawadkar and the MLAs based on an appeal filed by the Congress party. The party accuses Tawadkar of deliberately delaying the hearings and disrespecting the Supreme Court’s directives.
The Congress party is planning to file a contempt petition against speaker Ramesh Tawadkar for not deciding on the defection of eight Congress MLAs to the BJP. The party’s legal team is working on the petition, which could be filed soon. The Supreme Court has already issued notices to Tawadkar and the MLAs based on an appeal filed by the Congress party. The party accuses Tawadkar of deliberately delaying the hearings and disrespecting the Supreme Court’s directives.
SC orders probe whether NCLAT bench violated top court verdict
The Supreme Court has ordered an enquiry into whether the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) violated its verdict in a corporate battle case. The NCLAT allegedly passed an order despite being informed that the result of the annual general meeting was not yet available. The court has stated that if this is true, it would constitute defiance of its order. The bench has requested the report of the scrutinizer before delivering its judgment.
The Supreme Court has ordered an enquiry into whether the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) violated its verdict in a corporate battle case. The NCLAT allegedly passed an order despite being informed that the result of the annual general meeting was not yet available. The court has stated that if this is true, it would constitute defiance of its order. The bench has requested the report of the scrutinizer before delivering its judgment.
Jharkhand high court dismisses Hemant Soren’s petition against ED summons in money laundering case
The Jharkhand high court has dismissed a petition filed by Chief Minister Hemant Soren, challenging the summons issued by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in a money laundering case. The court stated that the period of appearance in the summons has already passed, rendering the petition without merit. Soren had previously approached the Supreme Court, but was directed to seek relief from the Jharkhand high court. The high court also noted that the issue of challenging certain sections of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act had already been decided by the Supreme Court.
The Jharkhand high court has dismissed a petition filed by Chief Minister Hemant Soren, challenging the summons issued by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in a money laundering case. The court stated that the period of appearance in the summons has already passed, rendering the petition without merit. Soren had previously approached the Supreme Court, but was directed to seek relief from the Jharkhand high court. The high court also noted that the issue of challenging certain sections of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act had already been decided by the Supreme Court.
